List of Articles Civil Liability

• Open Access Article
  • Abstract Page
  • Full-Text
  
  1 - Civil Liability of Minor Supervisor Against his detrimental Act in Iran and England’s Law
  Maryam  Tafazoli Mehrjardi Behshid Arfania
  Minors cannot manage their affairs personally because of their age or physical disabilities and they need the help of others in the realm of life. The legislator has been supporting them, in addition to the stone that has been prescribed for the protection of their righ More

  Minors cannot manage their affairs personally because of their age or physical disabilities and they need the help of others in the realm of life. The legislator has been supporting them, in addition to the stone that has been prescribed for the protection of their rights and interests, Has designated a person or persons to manage their affairs. The civil liability of the supervisor against a minor is either a law or a fault-based contract and he is held liable if the supervisor declines to keep the money. In the Iranian legal system under Article 1238 Civil Law and Article 7 Civil Liability Law if the supervisor fails to maintain custody and harm the child to others and common law system, it is the responsibility of the superintendent to fulfill the civil responsibility of the child, and he is held responsible for what he has done in the custody of the child. Manuscript profile
• Open Access Article
  • Abstract Page
  • Full-Text
  
  2 - Government's Civil And International Responsibility For The Damages Caused By The Internet
  Rasoul Malakooti Mona Khalilzadeh
  Internet space is a territory in which time and place are meaningless in the conventional sense, so government sovereignty and control are not perfect. However, the government (in a sense) as the sole originator of the international (internet) point of contact in the More

  Internet space is a territory in which time and place are meaningless in the conventional sense, so government sovereignty and control are not perfect. However, the government (in a sense) as the sole originator of the international (internet) point of contact in the country, for the primary oversight of the licensing and provision of Internet services to legal entities such as ISPs or the transfer of sovereignty to some Attendees in cyberspace, including their agents and employees, or duties to ordinary citizens or to certain corporate actions, may have civil liability for damages resulting from the use of the Internet stewardship or retaliation. Also in international crimes that endanger world peace and security, the government will also have international responsibility as a result of acts of harm done personally or by private actors. Cyber-attacks as a Wrongful international act by the government with government bodies have been greatly reduced due to their ability to identify and attribute to the government, and governments are seeking to curb the These nongovernmental actors carry out such attacks in order to avoid responsibility. Manuscript profile
• Open Access Article
  • Abstract Page
  • Full-Text
  
  3 - Investigating The Element Of Fault In The Civil Liability Of The Minor Guardian In Iran And England’s Law
  Maryam  Tafazoli Mehrjardi behshid arfania
  The objective of civil liability is to maintain the coexistence of individuals in society; If a person inflicts unlawful harm on other person, he is responsible for the effects of his harmful actions. Therefore, regardless of the injurer’s physical and mental conditions More

  The objective of civil liability is to maintain the coexistence of individuals in society; If a person inflicts unlawful harm on other person, he is responsible for the effects of his harmful actions. Therefore, regardless of the injurer’s physical and mental conditions, what he has done should be examined as being in conflict or compliance with the behavior of a reasonable or normal human being as a criterion of fault. In Iranian law, fault has a social meaning and therefore minors can be deemed guilty and responsible in this respect. If a guardian is responsible to maintain or to take care of a minor according to the law or the contract and commits a fault accordingly, the minor is not responsible but the person who has failed to maintain or to take care of the minor will be responsible for the compensation. Under English law, guardians, including parents and others caring for minors, have no representative responsibility for minors’ faults. The guardian is only responsible if he or she has personally failed to take care of or has motivated the minor to commit a fault. Manuscript profile
• Open Access Article
  • Abstract Page
  • Full-Text
  
  4 - A Critical Look at Judges' Civil Liability in Iranian Jurisprudence and Law
  Shaghayegh  Shaghayegh shamsi Abedin momeni
  10.61186/ahrar.38611.2.4.68
  According to Article 171 of the Constitution, if a judge causes damage to another as a result of a mistake or fault in a case or in a sentence or in the application of a sentence to a particular case, he is the guarantor in case of fault. Otherwise, the compensation i More

  According to Article 171 of the Constitution, if a judge causes damage to another as a result of a mistake or fault in a case or in a sentence or in the application of a sentence to a particular case, he is the guarantor in case of fault. Otherwise, the compensation is done by the government. It seems that the principle of government responsibility for the judge's mistake in jurisprudential books was due to the necessity of ijtihad in judges, and jurists based on this condition the verdict issued by the judge was considered his fatwa and they believed that the judge rules by his ijtihad, so they put the responsibility for compensation on the treasury. But the important point is that he should not be granted judicial immunity, because everyone has a responsibility wherever he is, and he should be held accountable for that position and his mistakes, and the judge, like other members of society, is paid for the act of judging and this does not cause the government, which has no worker-employer relationship with the judge, accept compensation for the damages caused by act them. Therefore, the purpose of writing this article is to critique the judicial process in the civil liability of judges and to compensate the damages from the government. The research method in this study is analytical-descriptive and the method of collecting information is library and documentary. Manuscript profile
• Open Access Article
  • Abstract Page
  • Full-Text
  
  5 - Examining The Possibility Of Resorting To Non-Contractual Liability Bases In Claiming Contractual Damages
  milad rohampour Dr. Seyed Ali Jabbar Golbaghi ​​Masouleh
  10.61186/ahrar.38615.2.4.102
  One of the important bases to constitute the liability in remedies is the existence of fault at act and omission. in iranian law subject to the regulations, this matter is practically able to consider and related to an act that the fault would be involved in its notio More

  One of the important bases to constitute the liability in remedies is the existence of fault at act and omission. in iranian law subject to the regulations, this matter is practically able to consider and related to an act that the fault would be involved in its notion. nevertheless in this matter there is not uniqe idea about bases and quality of fualt among the lawers that tends to contratual or not contarctual liability. on the side of contartual one with attention to code 221 of civil code of iran beaause of lacking clear jurisprudentic history even with definit breach of contract generate the liability and the remedies from it would be payable by causation. it is easier to discover the elements of contractual liability in comparsion with non contractual one and with attention to full compensate of remedies the right to choose between them two seems to be fine. the purpose is that looking for the authority for victim of a damage to choose that what bases noticed a bove is suitable for him. this artice is made by virtue of library searching and related articles. Manuscript profile
• Open Access Article
  • Abstract Page
  • Full-Text
  
  6 - Civil responsibility of hospital construction, the centrality of legal entities in Iranian law
  Mohammad Khobi mikhosh
  The aim of this research is to examine the civil liability of hospital construction with a focus on legal entities in Iranian law. The research method is descriptive-analytical, and information has been collected using library sources. The results of the study show that More

  The aim of this research is to examine the civil liability of hospital construction with a focus on legal entities in Iranian law. The research method is descriptive-analytical, and information has been collected using library sources. The results of the study show that the basis of civil liability arising from construction in Iran is established in various laws, including the Civil Code, Civil Liability Law, Islamic Penal Code, and other laws. In addition to general rules of civil liability, there are also specific rules regarding the civil liability of construction in the Civil Code, Civil Liability Law, and Islamic Penal Code, which are generally based on fault. However, the basis of fault in construction is inappropriate and proving fault by the injured party seems incorrect. The civil liability of legal entities in hospital construction, like other constructions, is based on presumed fault. Although current regulations in this area do not have the necessary efficiency, effectiveness, deterrence, and compensation due to the sensitivity of hospital construction, resulting in non-compliance with construction regulations and consequently, short-lived buildings, irreparable damages, lack of trust in constructions, insecurity in buildings, and unsuitability of hospital buildings for patients' needs. As a result, the civil liability of legal entities in hospital construction based on the principle of fault is worth investigating Manuscript profile
• Open Access Article
  • Abstract Page
  • Full-Text
  
  7 - Medical liability between Islamic republic of Iran and Italy
  Samad Golbandi haqiqat Akbar Eimanpor
  Nowadays, medical malpractice is considered to be a current topic in law; however, there`s no unanimity as to its definition among different countries. Therefore in this article a comparative study of medical malpractice laws in Iran and Italy is presented. The goal of More

  Nowadays, medical malpractice is considered to be a current topic in law; however, there`s no unanimity as to its definition among different countries. Therefore in this article a comparative study of medical malpractice laws in Iran and Italy is presented. The goal of this article is comparing medical malpractice laws in Iran and Italy. It will study civil and criminal liabilities of the practitioner, the foundations of liability, the basics of practitioner’s liability, patient’s consent, practitioner’s duty in disclosing information regarding the illness and the side effects of treatments, and also governmental insurance coverage. The study shows that in both countries, the Theory of Commitment is considered as the criterion for causing liability, and the practitioner’s commitment in monetary matters is a obligation of means Manuscript profile
• Open Access Article
  • Abstract Page
  • Full-Text
  
  8 - Civil liability of arbitrators in online arbitration
  Reza Shahidi sadeghi
  Arbitration is one of the most common methods of peaceful dispute resolution in domestic and international disputes outside of state courts. In the present era, international commercial arbitration has become more important among merchants due to its faster resolution a More

  Arbitration is one of the most common methods of peaceful dispute resolution in domestic and international disputes outside of state courts. In the present era, international commercial arbitration has become more important among merchants due to its faster resolution and cost savings for both parties, and therefore, access to new communication technologies by the global community has led to the emergence of arbitration in the virtual world and become a matter of concern. Therefore, arbitrators accept certain duties under the arbitration agreement between the parties, which, if not fulfilled, may result in civil liability for breach of contract and consequently, cause material and moral damages and establish causation. In general, the legal system of customary law has accepted immunity (exemption) from liability for international arbitrators, and in written legal systems and the arbitration system of Iran, the principle of civil liability of arbitrators has been accepted. The question that arises in the mind of the writer is what effects and provisions are applicable to the civil liability of arbitrators in virtual arbitration? In response, it should be said that due to the lack of independent, explicit, comprehensive, and coherent laws and regulations on the civil liability of arbitrators in virtual space in domestic and international areas and the fact that virtual arbitration is essentially similar to traditional arbitration, and only differ in formalities and procedures governing the process, it seems that the issue of civil liability of arbitrators in traditional and virtual arbitration does not have much difference in terms of effects and provisions. Manuscript profile